In terms of OpenAI,
our goal is to make AGI and distribute it,
make it safe, for the broad
benefit of humanity.
I think by all accounts,
we have done a lot in that direction.
Clearly our tactics
have shifted over time.
I think we didn't really know
what we were going to be
when we grew up.
We didn't think we would have
to build a company around this.
We learned a lot about how it goes
and the realities of what these systems
were going to take from capital.
But I think we've been,
in terms of putting incredibly capable AI
with a high degree of safety
in the hands of a lot of people,
and giving them tools to sort of
do whatever amazing
things they're going to do,
I think it'd be hard to give us
a bad grade on that.
I do think it's fair that we should
be open sourcing more.
I think it was reasonable
for all of the reasons
that you asked earlier,
as we weren't sure about the impact
these systems were going to have
and how to make them safe,