How to pronounce "stationary"

Right when I was 15 was when I first got interested in solar energy.

My family had moved from Fort Lee, New Jersey to California,

from the snow to lots of heat, and gas lines.

There was gas rationing in 1973.

The energy crisis was in full bore.

I started reading "Popular Science" magazine,

and I got really excited about the potential of solar energy

to try and solve that crisis.

I had just taken trigonometry in high school,

I learned about the parabola

and how it could concentrate rays of light to a single focus.

That got me very excited.

And I really felt that there would be potential

to build some kind of thing that could concentrate light.

So, I started this company called Solar Devices.

And this was a company where I built parabolas,

I took metal shop,

and I remember walking into metal shop building parabolas and Stirling engines.

And I was building a Stirling engine over on the lathe,

and all the motorcycle guys said, "You're building a bong, aren't you?"

And I said, "No, it's a Stirling engine." But they didn't believe me.

I sold the plans for this engine

and for this dish in the back of "Popular Science" magazine,

for four dollars each.

And I earned enough money to pay for my first year of Caltech.

It was a really big excitement for me to get into Caltech.

And at my first year at Caltech, I continued the business.

But then, in the second year of Caltech, they started grading.

The whole first year was pass/fail, but the second year was graded.

I wasn't able to keep up with the business,

and I ended up with a 25-year detour.

My dream had been to convert solar energy at a very practical cost,

but then I had this big detour.

First, the coursework at Caltech.

Then, when I graduated from Caltech, the IBM PC came out,

and I got addicted to the IBM PC in 1981.

And then in 1983, Lotus 1-2-3 came out,

and I was completely blown away by Lotus 1-2-3.

I began operating my business with 1-2-3, began writing add-ins for 1-2-3,

wrote a natural language interface to 1-2-3.

I started an educational software company after I joined Lotus,

and then I started Idealab so I could have a roof

under which I could build multiple companies in succession.

Much later -- in 2000, very recently -- the new California energy crisis --

what was purported to be a big energy crisis -- was coming.

And I was trying to figure out

if we could build something that would capitalize on that

and get people backup energy, in case the crisis really came.

And I started looking at how we could build battery backup systems

that could give people five hours, 10 hours, maybe even a full day,

or three days' worth of backup power.

I'm glad you heard earlier today, batteries are unbelievably --

lack density compared to fuel.

So much more energy can be stored with fuel than with batteries.

You'd have to fill your entire parking space of one garage space

just to give yourself four hours of battery backup.

And I concluded, after researching every other technology

that we could deploy for storing energy --

flywheels, different formulations of batteries --

it just wasn't practical to store energy.

So what about making energy? Maybe we could make energy.

I tried to figure out -- maybe solar's become attractive.

It's been 25 years since I was doing this,

let me go back and look at what's been happening with solar cells.

And the price had gone down from 10 dollars a watt

to about four or five dollars a watt, but it stabilized.

And it needed to get much lower to be cost-effective.

I studied all the new things that had happened in solar cells,

and was looking for ways we could make solar cells more inexpensively.

A lot of new things are happening to do that,

but fundamentally, the process requires a tremendous amount of energy.

Some people say it takes more energy to make a solar cell

than it will give out in its entire life.

If we reduce the amount of energy it takes to make the cells,

that will become more practical.

But right now, you pretty much have to take silicon,

put it in an oven at 1600 F for 17 hours, to make the cells.

A lot of people are working to try and reduce that,

but I didn't have anything to contribute.

So I tried to figure out what other way could we try

to make cost-effective solar electricity.

What if we collect the sun with a large reflector --

like I had been thinking about in high school,

but maybe with modern technology we could make it cheaper --

concentrate it to a small converter,

and then the conversion device wouldn't have to be as expensive,

because it's much smaller, rather than solar cells,

which have to cover the entire surface that you want to gather sun from.

This seemed practical now,

because a lot of new technologies had come in the 25 years

since I had last looked at it.

There was a lot of new manufacturing techniques,

not to mention really cheap miniature motors --

brushless motors, servomotors, stepper motors,

that are used in printers and scanners.

So, that's a breakthrough.

Of course, inexpensive microprocessors

and a very important breakthrough -- genetic algorithms.

I'll be very short on genetic algorithms.

It's a powerful way of solving intractable problems using natural selection.

You take a problem that you can't solve with a pure mathematical answer,

you build an evolutionary system to try multiple tries at guessing,

you add sex --

where you take half of one solution and half of another

and then make new mutations --

and you use natural selection to kill off not-as-good solutions.

Usually, with a genetic algorithm on a computer today,

with a three gigahertz processor,

you can solve many formerly intractable problems

in just a matter of minutes.

So we tried to come up with a way to use genetic algorithms

to create a new type of concentrator.

And I'll show you what we came up with.

Traditionally, concentrators look like this.

Those shapes are parabolas.

They take all the parallel incoming rays and focus it to a single spot.

They have to track the sun,

because they have to point directly at the sun.

They usually have a one degree acceptance angle --

once they're more than a degree off,

none of the sunlight rays will hit the focus.

So we tried to come up with a non-tracking collector

that would gather much more than one degree of light, with no moving parts.

So we created a genetic algorithm to try this out,

we made a model in Excel of a multisurface reflector,

and an amazing thing evolved, literally,

from trying a billion cycles, a billion different attempts,

with a fitness function that defined how can you collect the most light,

from the most angles, over a day, from the sun.

And this is the shape that evolved.

It's this non-tracking collector with these six tuba-like horns,

and each of them collect light in the following way --

if the sunlight strikes right here,

it might bounce right to the center, the hot spot, directly,

but if the sun is off axis and comes from the side,

it might hit two places and take two bounces.

So for direct light, it takes only one bounce,

for off-axis light it might take two,

and for extreme off-axis, it might take three.

Your efficiency goes down with more bounces,

because you lose about 10 percent with each bounce,

but this allowed us to collect light from a plus or minus 25-degree angle.

So, about two and a half hours of the day

we could collect with a stationary component.

Solar cells collect light for four and a half hours though.

On an average adjusted day, a solar cell --

because the sun's moving across the sky,

the solar cell is going down with a sine wave function of performance

at the off-axis angles.

It collects about four and a half average hours of sunlight a day.

So even this, although it was great with no moving parts --

we could achieve high temperatures -- wasn't enough.

We needed to beat solar cells.

So we took a look at another idea.

We looked at a way to break up a parabola into individual petals that would track.

So what you see here is 12 separate petals

that each could be controlled with individual microprocessors

that would only cost a dollar.

You can buy a two-megahertz microprocessor for a dollar now.

And you can buy stepper motors that pretty much never wear out

because they have no brushes,

for a dollar.

So we can control all 12 of these petals for under 50 dollars

and what this would allow us to do is not have to move the focus any more,

but only move the petals.

The whole system would have a much lower profile,

but also we could gather sunlight for six and a half to seven hours a day.

Now that we have concentrated sunlight,

what are we going to put at the center to convert sunlight to electricity?

So we tried to look at all the different heat engines

that have been used in history to convert sunlight or heat to electricity,

And one of the great ones of all time,

James Watt's steam engine of 1788 was a major breakthrough.

James Watt didn't actually invent the steam engine, he just refined it.

But his refinements were incredible.

He added new linear motion guides to the pistons,

he added a condenser to cool the steam outside the cylinder,

he made the engine double-acting, so it had double the power.

Those were major breakthroughs. All of the improvements he made --

and it's justifiable that our measure of energy, the watt,

today is named after him.

So we looked at this engine, and this had some potential.

Steam engines are dangerous,

and they had tremendous impact on the world --

industrial revolution and ships and locomotives.

But they're usually good to be large,

so they're not good for distributed power generation.

They're also very high-pressure, so they're dangerous.

Another type of engine is the hot air engine.

And the hot air engine also was not invented by Robert Stirling,

but Robert Stirling came along in 1816 and radically improved it.

This engine, because it was so interesting --

it only worked on air, no steam --

has led to hundreds of creative designs over the years

that use the Stirling engine principle.

But after the Stirling engine, Otto came along,

and also, he didn't invent the internal combustion engine,

he just refined it.

He showed it in Paris in 1867, and it was a major achievement

because it brought the power density of the engine way up.

You could now get a lot more power in a lot smaller space,

and that allowed the engine to be used for mobile applications.

So, once you have mobility,

you're making a lot of engines because you've got lots of units,

as opposed to steam ships or big factories,

so this was the engine that ended up benefiting from mass production

where all the other engines didn't.

So, because it went into mass production,

costs were reduced, 100 years of refinement,

emissions were reduced, tremendous production value.

There have been hundreds of millions of internal combustion engines built,

compared to thousands of Stirling engines built.

And not nearly as many small steam engines being built anymore,

only large ones for big operations.

So after looking at these three, and 47 others,

we concluded that the Stirling engine would be the best one to use.

I want to give you a brief explanation of how we looked at it and how it works.

So we tried to look at the Stirling engine in a new way,

because it was practical --

weight no longer mattered for our application.

The internal combustion engine took off because weight mattered,

because you were moving around.

But if you're trying to generate solar energy in a static place

the weight doesn't matter so much.

We also discovered that efficiency doesn't matter so much

if your energy source is free.

Normally, efficiency is crucial

because the fuel cost of your engine over its life

dwarfs the cost of the engine.

But if your fuel source is free,

then the only thing that matters

is the up-front capital cost of the engine.

So you don't want to optimize for efficiency,

you want to optimize for power per dollar.

So using that new twist, with the new criteria,

we thought we could relook at the Stirling engine,

and also bring genetic algorithms in.

Basically, Robert Stirling didn't have Gordon Moore before him

to get us three gigahertz of processor power.

So we took the same genetic algorithm

that we used earlier to make that concentrator,

which didn't work out for us,

to optimize the Stirling engine,

and make its design sizes and all of its dimensions

the exact optimum to get the most power per dollar,

irrespective of weight, irrespective of size,

just to get the most conversion of solar energy,

because the sun is free.

And that's the process we took -- let me show you how the engine works.

The simplest heat engine, or hot air engine, of all time

would be this -- take a box, a steel canister, with a piston.

Put a flame under it, the piston moves up.

Take it off the flame and pour water on it, or let it cool down,

the piston moves down.

That's a heat engine.

That's the most fundamental heat engine you could have.

The problem is the efficiency is one hundredth of one percent,

because you're heating all the metal of the chamber

and then cooling all the metal of the chamber each time.

And you're only getting power from the air that's heating at the same time,

but you're wasting energy heating and cooling the metal.

So someone came up with a very clever idea.

Instead of heating and cooling the whole cylinder,

what about if you put a displacer inside --

a little thing that shuttles the air back and forth.

You move that up and down with a little bit of energy

but now you're only shifting the air down to the hot end and up to the cold end.

So, now you're not alternately heating and cooling the metal, just the air.

That allows you to get the efficiency up

from a hundredth of a percent to about two percent.

And then Robert Stirling came along with this genius idea,

which was, well, I'm still not heating the metal now,

with this kind of engine,

but I'm still reheating all the air.

I'm still heating the air every time and cooling the air every time.

What about if I put a thermal sponge in the middle,

in the passageway between where the air has to move between hot and cold?

So he made fine wires, and cracked glass,

and all different kinds of materials to be a heat sponge.

So when the air pushes up to go from the hot end to the cold end,

it puts some heat into the sponge.

And then when the air comes back after it's been cooled,

it picks up that heat again.

So you're reusing your energy five or six times,

and that brings the efficiency up to between 30 and 40 percent.

It's a little known, but brilliant, genius invention of Robert Stirling

that takes the hot air engine from being somewhat impractical --

like I found out when I made the real simple version in high school --

to very potentially possible,

once you get the efficiency up,

if you can design this to be low enough cost.

So we really set out on a path to try and make the lowest cost possible.

We built a huge mathematical model of how a Stirling engine works.

We applied the genetic algorithm.

We got the results from that for the optimal engine.

We built engines --

so we built 100 different engines over the last two years.

We measured each one, we readjusted the model to what we measured,

and then we led that to the current prototype.

It led to a very compact, inexpensive engine,

and this is what the engine looks like.

Let me show you what it looks like in real life.

So this is the engine. It's just a small cylinder down here,

which holds the generator inside and all the linkage,

and it's the hot cap -- the hot cylinder on the top --

this part gets hot, this part is cool,

and electricity comes out.

The exact converse is also true.

If you put electricity in, this will get hot and this will get cold,

you get refrigeration.

So it's a complete reversible cycle,

a very efficient cycle, and quite a simple thing to make.

So now you put the two things together.

So you have the engine.

What if you combine the petals and the engine in the center?

The petals track and the engine gets the concentrated sunlight,

takes that heat and turns it into electricity.

This is what the first prototype of our system looked like

with the petals and the engine in the center.

This is being run out in the sun,

and now I want to show you what the actual thing looks like.

(Applause)

Thank you.

So this is a unit with the 12 petals.

These petals cost about a dollar each --

they're lightweight, injection-molded plastic, aluminized.

The mechanism to control each petal is below there,

with a microprocessor on each one.

There are thermocouples on the engine --

little sensors that detect the heat when the sunlight strikes them.

Each petal adjusts itself separately to keep the highest temperature on it.

When the sun comes out in the morning, the petals will seek the sun,

find it by searching for the highest temperature.

About a minute and a half or two minutes after the rays are striking the hot cap

the engine will be warm enough to start

and then the engine will generate electricity

for about six and a half hours a day --

six and a half to seven hours as the sun moves across the sky.

A critical part that we can take advantage of

is that we have these inexpensive microprocessors

and each of these petals is autonomous,

and each of these petals figures out where the sun is with no user setup.

So you don't have to tell what latitude, longitude you're at,

what your roof slope angle is, or what orientation.

It doesn't really care.

What it does is it searches to find the hottest spot,

it searches again a half an hour later, a day later, a month later.

It basically figures out where on Earth you are

by watching the direction the sun moves,

so you don't have to actually enter anything about that.

The way the unit works is,

when the sun comes out, the engine will start

and you get power out here.

We have AC and DC, get 12 volts DC,

so that could be used for certain applications.

We have an inverter in there, so you get 117 volts AC.

And you also get hot water. The hot water's optional.

You don't have to use it, it will cool itself.

But you can use it to optionally heat hot water

and that brings the efficiency up even higher

because some of the heat that you'd normally be rejecting,

you can now use as useful energy, whether it's for a pool or hot water.

Let me show you a quick movie of what this looks like running.

This is the first test where we took it outside

and each of the petals were individually seeking.

And what they do is step, very coarsely at first,

and very finely afterward.

Once they get a temperature reading on the thermocouple

indicating they found the sun,

they slow down and do a fine search.

Then the petals will move into position, and the engine will start.

We've been working on this for the last two years.

We're very excited about the progress, we have a long way to go though.

This is how we envision it would be in a residential installation:

you'd probably have more than one unit on your roof.

It could be on your roof, your backyard, or somewhere else.

You don't have to have enough units to power your entire house,

you just save money with each incremental one you add.

So you're still using the grid potentially,

in this type of application, to be your backup supply --

of course, you can't use these at night, and you can't use these on cloudy days.

But by reducing your energy use, pretty much at the peak times --

usually when you have your air conditioning on,

or other times like that --

this generates the peak power at the peak usage time,

so it's very complementary in that sense.

This is how we would envision a residential application.

We also think there's very big potential for energy farms,

especially in remote land where there happens to be a lot of sun.

It's a really good combination of those two factors.

It turns out there's a lot of powerful sun all around the world, obviously,

but in special places

where it happens to be relatively inexpensive to place these

and also in many more places where there is high wind power.

So an example of that is, here's the map of the United States.

Pretty much everywhere that's not green or blue is a really ideal place,

but even the green or blue areas are good,

just not as good as the places that are red, orange and yellow.

But the hot spot right around Las Vegas and Death Valley is very good.

And is only affects the payback period,

it doesn't mean that you couldn't use solar energy;

you could use it anywhere on Earth.

It just affects the payback period

if you're comparing to grid-supplied electricity.

But if you don't have grid-supplied electricity,

then the question of payback is a different one entirely.

It's just how many watts do you get per dollar,

and how could you benefit from that to change your life in some way.

This is the map of the whole Earth,

and you can see a huge swathe in the middle

where a large part of the population is,

there's tremendous chances for solar energy.

And of course, look at Africa.

The potential to take advantage of solar energy there is unbelievable,

and I'm really excited to talk more about finding ways we can help with that.

So, in conclusion, I would say my journey has shown me

that you can revisit old ideas in a new light,

and sometimes ideas that have been discarded in the past

can be practical now if you apply some new technology or new twists.

We believe we're getting very close to something practical and affordable.

Our short-term goal for this is to be half the price of solar cells

and our longer-term goal is to be less than a five-year payback.

And at less than a five-year payback, this becomes very economic.

So you don't have to just have a feel-good attitude about energy

to want to have one of these.

It just makes economic sense.

Right now, solar paybacks are between 30 and 50 years.

If you get it down below five years,

then it's almost a no-brainer because the interest to own it --

someone else will finance it for you and you can just make money from day one.

So that's our real powerful goal

that we're really shooting for in the company.

Two other things that I learned that were very surprising to me --

one was how casual we are about energy.

I was walking from the elevator over here,

and even just looking at the stage right now --

so there's probably 20,500-watt lights right now.

There's 10,000 watts of light pouring on the stage,

one horsepower is 746 watts, at full power.

So there's basically 15 horses running at full speed just to keep the stage lit.

Not to mention the 200 horses that are probably running right now

to keep the air-conditioning going.

And it's just amazing,

walk in the elevator, and there's lights on in the elevator.

Of course, now I'm very sensitive at home when we leave the lights on by mistake.

But, everywhere around us we have insatiable use for energy

because it's so cheap.

And it's cheap because we've been subsidized by energy

that's been concentrated by the sun.

Basically, oil is solar-energy concentrate.

It's been pounded for a billion years with a lot of energy

to make it have all that energy contained in it.

And we don't have a birthright

to just use that up as fast as we are, I think.

And it would be great if we could make our energy usage renewable,

where as we're using the energy, we're creating it at the same pace,

and I really hope we can get there.

Thank you very much, you've been a great audience.