How to pronounce "sacked"

The things we make

have one supreme quality --

they live longer than us.

We perish, they survive;

we have one life, they have many lives,

and in each life they can mean different things.

Which means that, while we all have one biography,

they have many.

I want this morning to talk

about the story, the biography -- or rather the biographies --

of one particular object,

one remarkable thing.

It doesn't, I agree,

look very much.

It's about the size of a rugby ball.

It's made of clay,

and it's been fashioned

into a cylinder shape,

covered with close writing

and then baked dry in the sun.

And as you can see,

it's been knocked about a bit,

which is not surprising

because it was made two and a half thousand years ago

and was dug up

in 1879.

But today,

this thing is, I believe,

a major player

in the politics of the Middle East.

And it's an object

with fascinating stories

and stories that are by no means over yet.

The story begins

in the Iran-Iraq war

and that series of events

that culminated

in the invasion of Iraq

by foreign forces,

the removal of a despotic ruler

and instant regime change.

And I want to begin

with one episode from that sequence of events

that most of you would be very familiar with,

Belshazzar's feast --

because we're talking about the Iran-Iraq war

of 539 BC.

And the parallels

between the events

of 539 BC and 2003 and in between

are startling.

What you're looking at is Rembrandt's painting,

now in the National Gallery in London,

illustrating the text from the prophet Daniel

in the Hebrew scriptures.

And you all know roughly the story.

Belshazzar, the son of Nebuchadnezzar,

Nebuchadnezzar who'd conquered Israel, sacked Jerusalem

and captured the people

and taken the Jews back to Babylon.

Not only the Jews, he'd taken the temple vessels.

He'd ransacked, desecrated the temple.

And the great gold vessels of the temple in Jerusalem

had been taken to Babylon.

Belshazzar, his son,

decides to have a feast.

And in order to make it even more exciting,

he added a bit of sacrilege to the rest of the fun,

and he brings out the temple vessels.

He's already at war with the Iranians,

with the king of Persia.

And that night, Daniel tells us,

at the height of the festivities

a hand appeared and wrote on the wall,

"You are weighed in the balance and found wanting,

and your kingdom is handed over

to the Medes and the Persians."

And that very night

Cyrus, king of the Persians, entered Babylon

and the whole regime of Belshazzar fell.

It is, of course, a great moment

in the history

of the Jewish people.

It's a great story. It's story we all know.

"The writing on the wall"

is part of our everyday language.

What happened next

was remarkable,

and it's where our cylinder

enters the story.

Cyrus, king of the Persians,

has entered Babylon without a fight --

the great empire of Babylon,

which ran from central southern Iraq

to the Mediterranean,

falls to Cyrus.

And Cyrus makes a declaration.

And that is what this cylinder is,

the declaration made by the ruler guided by God

who had toppled the Iraqi despot

and was going to bring freedom to the people.

In ringing Babylonian --

it was written in Babylonian --

he says, "I am Cyrus, king of all the universe,

the great king, the powerful king,

king of Babylon, king of the four quarters of the world."

They're not shy of hyperbole as you can see.

This is probably

the first real press release

by a victorious army

that we've got.

And it's written, as we'll see in due course,

by very skilled P.R. consultants.

So the hyperbole is not actually surprising.

And what is the great king, the powerful king,

the king of the four quarters of the world going to do?

He goes on to say that, having conquered Babylon,

he will at once let all the peoples

that the Babylonians -- Nebuchadnezzar and Belshazzar --

have captured and enslaved

go free.

He'll let them return to their countries.

And more important,

he will let them all recover

the gods, the statues,

the temple vessels

that had been confiscated.

All the peoples that the Babylonians had repressed and removed

will go home,

and they'll take with them their gods.

And they'll be able to restore their altars

and to worship their gods

in their own way, in their own place.

This is the decree,

this object is the evidence

for the fact that the Jews,

after the exile in Babylon,

the years they'd spent sitting by the waters of Babylon,

weeping when they remembered Jerusalem,

those Jews were allowed to go home.

They were allowed to return to Jerusalem

and to rebuild the temple.

It's a central document

in Jewish history.

And the Book of Chronicles, the Book of Ezra in the Hebrew scriptures

reported in ringing terms.

This is the Jewish version

of the same story.

"Thus said Cyrus, king of Persia,

'All the kingdoms of the earth have the Lord God of heaven given thee,

and he has charged me

to build him a house in Jerusalem.

Who is there among you of his people?

The Lord God be with him,

and let him go up.'"

"Go up" -- aaleh.

The central element, still,

of the notion of return,

a central part

of the life of Judaism.

As you all know, that return from exile,

the second temple,

reshaped Judaism.

And that change,

that great historic moment,

was made possible by Cyrus, the king of Persia,

reported for us in Hebrew in scripture

and in Babylonian in clay.

Two great texts,

what about the politics?

What was going on

was the fundamental shift in Middle Eastern history.

The empire of Iran, the Medes and the Persians,

united under Cyrus,

became the first great world empire.

Cyrus begins in the 530s BC.

And by the time of his son Darius,

the whole of the eastern Mediterranean

is under Persian control.

This empire is, in fact,

the Middle East as we now know it,

and it's what shapes the Middle East as we now know it.

It was the largest empire the world had known until then.

Much more important,

it was the first

multicultural, multifaith state

on a huge scale.

And it had to be run in a quite new way.

It had to be run in different languages.

The fact that this decree is in Babylonian says one thing.

And it had to recognize their different habits,

different peoples, different religions, different faiths.

All of those are respected by Cyrus.

Cyrus sets up a model

of how you run

a great multinational, multifaith, multicultural society.

And the result of that

was an empire that included the areas you see on the screen,

and which survived for 200 years of stability

until it was shattered by Alexander.

It left a dream of the Middle East as a unit,

and a unit where people of different faiths

could live together.

The Greek invasions ended that.

And of course, Alexander couldn't sustain a government

and it fragmented.

But what Cyrus represented

remained absolutely central.

The Greek historian Xenophon

wrote his book "Cyropaedia"

promoting Cyrus as the great ruler.

And throughout European culture afterward,

Cyrus remained the model.

This is a 16th century image

to show you how widespread

his veneration actually was.

And Xenophon's book on Cyrus

on how you ran a diverse society

was one of the great textbooks

that inspired the Founding Fathers

of the American Revolution.

Jefferson was a great admirer --

the ideals of Cyrus

obviously speaking to those 18th century ideals

of how you create religious tolerance

in a new state.

Meanwhile, back in Babylon,

things had not been going well.

After Alexander, the other empires,

Babylon declines, falls into ruins,

and all the traces of the great Babylonian empire are lost --

until 1879

when the cylinder is discovered

by a British Museum exhibition digging in Babylon.

And it enters now another story.

It enters that great debate

in the middle of the 19th century:

Are the scriptures reliable? Can we trust them?

We only knew

about the return of the Jews and the decree of Cyrus

from the Hebrew scriptures.

No other evidence.

Suddenly, this appeared.

And great excitement

to a world where those who believed in the scriptures

had had their faith in creation shaken

by evolution, by geology,

here was evidence

that the scriptures were historically true.

It's a great 19th century moment.

But -- and this, of course, is where it becomes complicated --

the facts were true,

hurrah for archeology,

but the interpretation was rather more complicated.

Because the cylinder account and the Hebrew Bible account

differ in one key respect.

The Babylonian cylinder

is written by the priests

of the great god of Bablyon, Marduk.

And, not surprisingly,

they tell you that all this was done by Marduk.

"Marduk, we hold, called Cyrus by his name."

Marduk takes Cyrus by the hand,

calls him to shepherd his people

and gives him the rule of Babylon.

Marduk tells Cyrus

that he will do these great, generous things

of setting the people free.

And this is why we should all be grateful to

and worship Marduk.

The Hebrew writers

in the Old Testament,

you will not be surprised to learn,

take a rather different view of this.

For them, of course, it can't possibly by Marduk

that made all this happen.

It can only be Jehovah.

And so in Isaiah,

we have the wonderful texts

giving all the credit of this,

not to Marduk

but to the Lord God of Israel --

the Lord God of Israel

who also called Cyrus by name,

also takes Cyrus by the hand

and talks of him shepherding his people.

It's a remarkable example

of two different priestly appropriations of the same event,

two different religious takeovers

of a political fact.

God, we know,

is usually on the side of the big battalions.

The question is, which god was it?

And the debate unsettles

everybody in the 19th century

to realize that the Hebrew scriptures

are part of a much wider world of religion.

And it's quite clear

the cylinder is older than the text of Isaiah,

and yet, Jehovah is speaking

in words very similar

to those used by Marduk.

And there's a slight sense that Isaiah knows this,

because he says,

this is God speaking, of course,

"I have called thee by thy name

though thou hast not known me."

I think it's recognized

that Cyrus doesn't realize

that he's acting under orders from Jehovah.

And equally, he'd have been surprised that he was acting under orders from Marduk.

Because interestingly, of course,

Cyrus is a good Iranian

with a totally different set of gods

who are not mentioned in any of these texts.

(Laughter)

That's 1879.

40 years on

and we're in 1917,

and the cylinder enters a different world.

This time, the real politics

of the contemporary world --

the year of the Balfour Declaration,

the year when the new imperial power in the Middle East, Britain,

decides that it will declare

a Jewish national home,

it will allow

the Jews to return.

And the response to this

by the Jewish population in Eastern Europe is rhapsodic.

And across Eastern Europe,

Jews display pictures of Cyrus

and of George V

side by side --

the two great rulers

who have allowed the return to Jerusalem.

And the Cyrus cylinder comes back into public view

and the text of this

as a demonstration of why what is going to happen

after the war is over in 1918

is part of a divine plan.

You all know what happened.

The state of Israel is setup,

and 50 years later, in the late 60s,

it's clear that Britain's role as the imperial power is over.

And another story of the cylinder begins.

The region, the U.K. and the U.S. decide,

has to be kept safe from communism,

and the superpower that will be created to do this

would be Iran, the Shah.

And so the Shah invents an Iranian history,

or a return to Iranian history,

that puts him in the center of a great tradition

and produces coins

showing himself

with the Cyrus cylinder.

When he has his great celebrations in Persepolis,

he summons the cylinder

and the cylinder is lent by the British Museum, goes to Tehran,

and is part of those great celebrations

of the Pahlavi dynasty.

Cyrus cylinder: guarantor of the Shah.

10 years later, another story:

Iranian Revolution, 1979.

Islamic revolution, no more Cyrus;

we're not interested in that history,

we're interested in Islamic Iran --

until Iraq,

the new superpower that we've all decided should be in the region,

attacks.

Then another Iran-Iraq war.

And it becomes critical for the Iranians

to remember their great past,

their great past

when they fought Iraq and won.

It becomes critical to find a symbol

that will pull together all Iranians --

Muslims and non-Muslims,

Christians, Zoroastrians, Jews living in Iran,

people who are devout, not devout.

And the obvious emblem is Cyrus.

So when the British Museum and Tehran National Musuem

cooperate and work together, as we've been doing,

the Iranians ask for one thing only

as a loan.

It's the only object they want.

They want to borrow the Cyrus cylinder.

And last year,

the Cyrus cylinder went to Tehran

for the second time.

It's shown being presented here, put into its case

by the director of the National Museum of Tehran,

one of the many women in Iran in very senior positions,

Mrs. Ardakani.

It was a huge event.

This is the other side of that same picture.

It's seen in Tehran

by between one and two million people

in the space of a few months.

This is beyond any blockbuster exhibition

in the West.

And it's the subject of a huge debate

about what this cylinder means, what Cyrus means,

but above all, Cyrus as articulated through this cylinder --

Cyrus as the defender of the homeland,

the champion, of course, of Iranian identity

and of the Iranian peoples,

tolerant of all faiths.

And in the current Iran,

Zoroastrians and Christians have guaranteed places

in the Iranian parliament, something to be very, very proud of.

To see this object in Tehran,

thousands of Jews living in Iran

came to Tehran to see it.

It became a great emblem,

a great subject of debate

about what Iran is at home and abroad.

Is Iran still to be the defender of the oppressed?

Will Iran set free the people

that the tyrants have enslaved and expropriated?

This is heady national rhetoric,

and it was all put together

in a great pageant

launching the return.

Here you see this out-sized Cyrus cylinder on the stage

with great figures from Iranian history

gathering to take their place

in the heritage of Iran.

It was a narrative presented

by the president himself.

And for me,

to take this object to Iran,

to be allowed to take this object to Iran

was to be allowed to be part

of an extraordinary debate

led at the highest levels

about what Iran is,

what different Irans there are

and how the different histories of Iran

might shape the world today.

It's a debate that's still continuing,

and it will continue to rumble,

because this object

is one of the great declarations

of a human aspiration.

It stands with the American constitution.

It certainly says far more about real freedoms

than Magna Carta.

It is a document that can mean so many things,

for Iran and for the region.

A replica of this

is at the United Nations.

In New York this autumn, it will be present

when the great debates

about the future of the Middle East take place.

And I want to finish by asking you

what the next story will be

in which this object figures.

It will appear, certainly,

in many more Middle Eastern stories.

And what story of the Middle East,

what story of the world,

do you want to see

reflecting what is said,

what is expressed in this cylinder?

The right of peoples

to live together in the same state,

worshiping differently, freely --

a Middle East, a world,

in which religion is not the subject of division

or of debate.

In the world of the Middle East at the moment,

the debates are, as you know, shrill.

But I think it's possible

that the most powerful and the wisest voice of all of them

may well be the voice

of this mute thing,

the Cyrus cylinder.

Thank you.

(Applause)