Transcriber: Isabel Pozas González
Reviewer: Capa Girl
Good morning everybody.
It's my great pleasure to be here today
and I would like to talk to you about resilience.
This is a picture of my grandmother,
my maternal grandmother,
Nancy Staples and she's leaning on the gate
at the end of our gardens and the land
that we worked two generations ago.
My earliest childhood memories are of her
and my great grandmother and my grandfather
particularly at this time of the year
trying to eke out every ounce of nutricional value
and economic value from our gardens and from the land.
It was a time to harvest but it was a time to
preserve, to jam, to pickle in any shape, way or form,
that nutritional value so we could take the bounty of
the summer and extend it for us, our family
but also for the poorer members of
he community around through the winter months.
She was born at the beginning of one world war
lived through a second, and survived polio.
She was tough, and when I think about resilience
I think about her, her generosity,
her toughness and many like her in that generation.
But let's talk about resilience today.
This is a picture of the Hotel Montana
taken in Port-au-Prince, Haiti
just after the devastating earthquake in 2010.
As you can see, it pancaked
killing 200 people or more as it did so.
It simply wasn't built to resist the shock.
Today we have to be more concerned
about natural disasters than ever before.
In the past 30 years the economic losses
from natural disasters have more than tripled.
The number of natural disasters has actually doubled.
Let's look at the numbers.
Over the past 30 years,
in low-income and middle-income countries alone
we have lost 1.2 trillion dollars due to damage.
That is equivalent to the GDP annually of Mexico.
Another way to think of it is that it is equivalent
to a third of all the official development assistance
that we've given in the same time period.
So think, that for every three dollars of
overseas development aid that we've given,
we've taken one and thrown it away.
In the same period, the same 30 years,
2.3 million people have perished.
That's the population of Namibia.
This is something that we need to pay attention to.
And it's getting more difficult.
Climate change is ravaging
especially poor countries.
Already this is not a phenomena for the future,
it's for us today.
Already countries are trying to work
their way through the complex nexus
between a food crisis, a water crisis
and an energy crisis
and climate change is just making it more difficult
and raising uncertainty.
At the same time, over the next 40 years
we will add 2.6 billion people to the cities of the world
most of that in developing countries.
In fact, 90% of that growth
will be in South Asia and Africa.
And, between now and 2050,
we will double the number of
people exposed to cyclones, and mudslides
and collapse as a result of natural disasters
in urban settings to more than 1.5 billion people.
The lack of building codes, the lack of
enforced building codes,
will punish these people.
And it will be the poor,
for it is always the poor,
the most vulnerable that will suffer most.
So think of the story that we are
beginning to understand.
We have more and more disasters.
Their intensity is being developed by climate change.
Climate change is adding to uncertainty
and we have a path of urbanization
that this civilization has never seen before.
How do we invest in our resilience?
Well, there are two key ways.
First of all, we actually have to change our growth path.
We need to move to a greener
and more inclusive growth now.
Every country can start on that journey
we must mitigate and adapt to climate change.
At the same time, we need to invest
in disaster risk management.
Disaster risk management must be part of development.
But it must also be considered a first line of defence
against the uncertainty that is coming tomorrow.
We need action in the public sector
we need frameworks in public policy
we need awareness and investment in the private sector
and we need civil society
and communities to engage.
Now, I talked to you earlier on
about the hotel in Haiti
the Hotel Montana, that had pancaked,
that had collapsed --
this is where we are today,
this is the Westin in Sendai
a gorgeous 37 storey hotel that survived
the catastrophic earthquake on March 11th, 2011,
the great Japan earthquake,
with almost no damage at all.
In fact it served as a disaster response centre.
Disaster risk management is
in the building code in Japan
disaster risk management in the building code
is enforced in Japan.
Disaster risk management is part
of the curricula in schools in Japan
and disaster risk management, not disaster
is part of the public discourse, here in Japan.
So, every country, every government,
can take steps now,
no matter where they are
on the development trajectory,
to try to start to invest in their own resilience.
But there is much more that can be done by
the international community as well.
Often, we offer too little, too late.
Between 1980 and 2009, the international community
spent 90 billion US dollars
on disaster-related assistance.
But of that 90 billion, only 3.6%
was invested in prevention and preparedness.
The other 96% plus was invested in emergency
response and reconstruction.
We have to change those numbers.
We have to switch that graph around.
In fact, we have to move
from a tradition of response
to a culture of prevention,
a culture of resilience.
But let me give you an example
of what does seem to start working.
This is the island of Saint Lucia, in the Caribbean
a small island developing state buffeted by storms
and hurricanes where landslides are,
unfortunately far too often,
part of the rhythm of life there.
In 2008, the World Bank, working
with 5 communities on the island
started to try to invest in the resilience
of these communities
and their ability to withstand and to avoid landslides.
And we built these hillside drains.
In 2010, when Hurricane Tomas hit the island
unfortunately many communities
suffered the landslides
that are so often part of the rhythm of life there
but the five communities where these hillside drains
had been built suffered no losses at all.
It's important to understand
the economics of this project as well.
For every dollar that the community
invested in these drains
it saved another three dollars
that it would have had
to spend on response and on reconstruction
if they had not taken the steps
towards preparedness.
So, if disaster risk resilience seems to make
such economic and business sense
is the private sector interested?
Is the private sector investing?
Well, the good news is that leaders are.
This is a picture of the Port of Cartagena, in Colombia
which is operated by a private firm, Muelles de Bosque
on a long term government concession.
Recently they undertook a study together with
the International Finance Corporation the private sector
lending arm of the World Bank where they looked at
the risks to the port operating environment from
changes in climate and changes in weather pattern.
What was interesting was that
in order to get the data for the report
they had to go to 30 different
public and private sources
which shows that there is
much to be done to make
the data and awareness of these issues
more available to public and private sector alike.
But the report resulted in recommendations
from changing the dredging regime
for the way that ships approach the port
to drainage to onside land operations.
So, for example, changing the heights of roads
and things like this.
And as a result of those recommendations
Muelles de Bosque invested 30 million dollars
in new capital construction
in order to make them more resilient
in order to improve their operations going forward.
So this port company was able to see the benefit
from investing in their ability to be resilient going forward
and that this was a commercial advantage to them.
So I've talked about the public sector
and I've talked about the private sector
and now we need to talk about community.
We know empirically that communities that have
stronger social bonds do better in disaster.
We know that in fact those strong social bonds
are one of the strongest determinants
of resilience within the community.
I mean, it makes intuitive sense
neighbours know which neighbour needs help
which neighbour is vulnerable
which neighbour is weakest.
We also know that families,
neighbours and friends
are the ones that help reconstruct
first after disaster has hit.
And so when we think of resilience
this is not an adapt construct
it's not just a word
that is thrown around in development circles.
Resilience is, both, the need for public policy
and the need for private investment.
It's also about a different response
from the international community
and it is about the local municipal leaders
the mayors that we elect
to lead us through these uncertain times.
But resilience, very importantly, is about community.
I think the people of Japan know that.
I think that my grandmother
her friends and others in our community
when I was growing up knew that too.
And so, for me personally,
when I think of resilience
I think of top-down policy
and investment flows
but I think of bottom-up building of community.
For me, resilience is about you and me
and the bonds that bring us together.
Thank you.
(Applause)