Cloe Shasha Brooks: Thank you so much
for being here, and welcome.
Ami Dar: Thank you.
Ali Abu Awwad: Thank you.
CSB: So to get started,
it would be helpful to hear a brief,
overly simplistic summary
of what each of you envisions
when you imagine a peaceful future
for Israel and Palestine.
And from there we can go into the details
of how your visions
might become a reality.
So let's start with Ali,
and then we can go to Ami.
AAA: Hello, everyone,
thank you for having us.
Ami, you look great.
Well, I envision, as a solution-maker,
I envision a place where our both
identities are in harmony of our life.
Both sides have tremendous
deep roots to this land,
from the ideology side of it,
from the political side of it,
from the national side,
from the religious side of it.
So peace for me
is where these two identities
are practiced freely in harmony,
in cooperation with the whole world
and the Middle East around us.
That's my big vision.
Ami Dar: Thank you, Ali
and thank you Cloe
for having us and having me here.
I would say yes to everything
that Ali just said.
I would add a couple of things.
One is that when people talk
about literally solutions to this,
there are always these debates of,
you know, one state, two state,
confederation, all of those things.
There are seven million Palestinians
who live, as we say,
between the river and the sea.
There are seven million Jews
who live between the river and the sea.
And I think it's important to start
by saying that all of them are staying.
There's a sort of set
of poisonous beliefs out there
that wants to either get rid
of the Palestinians
or tell the Jews to go back
to where they came from or whatever.
None of that is going to happen.
The Jews are staying,
the Palestinians are staying.
And I think one of the almost,
like, most urgent things right now
is to create a sort of informal
coalition of all those people
who agree on that basic starting point,
which is that whatever
solution we end up with
has to include and encompass
everyone who is there.
No one is leaving.
And ironically, there are lots
of people on the outside
who I think are sort of
poisoning the well a little bit
by saying things like, you know,
they should leave or they should go,
while the people who are there know
that they're basically staying.
So the specific solutions, you know,
one state, two states,
cantons, confederation.
I sort of, as long as there is peace,
justice, freedom, dignity for all,
the mechanics of it matter less to me.
I have my preferences.
But it starts from this idea
that the people are there,
they're not going anywhere,
and we have to find a solution together.
CSB: Thank you both for sharing that.
And to get to that place of peace,
it's going to require fundamental shifts
in so many aspects
of reality right now, right?
Security arrangements,
economic cooperation
cultural education,
human rights under the law
and, of course, leadership.
So let's dive in a bit further.
What are some of your visions
for what these shifts must entail
and how they might truly occur?
And we can go back to Ali for this one.
AAA: Yeah, I think
any peace process needs an umbrella,
a political umbrella
that will guarantee enough
and promote enough development,
enough healing, enough recognition,
enough cooperation between both sides.
You know, one of our biggest problems,
as solution makers
and peacemakers, sometimes,
between me and Ami, I promise you,
put us in a room for one hour,
we come up with an agreement.
The problem is we need a clear,
direct mechanism on the ground
that will speak to the people's needs,
not just transform people's emotions.
I mean, most of the Jewish
people in this land,
most of the Palestinian people
of this land are for peace yesterday,
not tomorrow.
Whatever you see in the media,
I'm telling you, we live here,
we live with the people.
Their deep intention is to have peace.
But the problem is people fear solution.
People fear peace.
Peace needs courage,
solution needs courage.
Number two, we still act as victims,
both sides, still as victims.
We have this competition of suffering:
who suffers more?
And this always leads us
to suffer more and more.
Number three,
we are a good resource
for international politics.
As Ami mentioned,
there are many fingers
and hands in this conflict
that are poisoning our reality every day
for their own interest.
And that’s why no one
is going to help us
as long as we are not able
to help ourselves here on the ground.
So for me, nonviolence
activism is my priority,
to create this nonviolence coalition
and nonviolence movement
that I'm leading today,
which is named Taghyeer, “change.”
Because if we want to change reality,
we need alternatives.
We need alternatives
that speak to people's needs
to people's economy,
to people's security,
to people's freedom of movement,
to people's education.
We need all of those systems as part
of a sustained political agreement
that hopefully both sides will push for.
We need recognition,
we need to see each other.
I mean, we should stop arguing
each other's identities
and switch to argue
each other's behaviors.
Because occupation is a behavior.
Violence is a behavior.
So if we feel secure to change,
to see and recognize our identities,
we will be able to change these behaviors
that cause us this ignorance
of ignoring each other's identities.
This is a fundamental need
for any peace process to happen.
And we need good leadership
to lead the process.
The good leadership
with the grassroots pressure.
This is how I see it.
Otherwise, believe me, we fight.
We killed each other enough.
No one is going to disappear.
No one is going to give up who he is
or his commitment to this land.
And with my sorrow, it seems like
the world doesn't exactly love Jews
and the Arabs don't exactly
love Palestinians.
We just have each other.
AD: Yeah, thank you for that.
Again, I can agree
with every word that Ali said,
so I won't, you know, repeat any of that.
I just sort of add a few things.
Maybe just, you know,
piggyback a little bit
on one thing I think you said, Ali,
I think in terms of perception,
I think perception very often
ends up being truth.
Self-perception is a truth
of the situation.
In a David and Goliath situation,
both sides believe they are David.
This is really important.
Now, of course, outside people say,
well, what do you mean?
Obviously Israel is stronger, etc.
Absolutely, compared to the Palestinians.
But within the broader
Arab and Muslim world
and within sort of Jewish history,
the deep perception of Israelis
is that we are the David,
they are the David
versus a Goliath out there.
And so this sort of victimhood Olympics
gets played all the time:
who’s more of a victim?
And that gets pretty tiresome
pretty quickly.
In the end, we have to all
come out of this.
Before going on, though,
I do want to recognize
that we're not having this conversation
in a vacuum.
People are dying in Gaza right now.
There are hostages in Gaza right now.
The situation is the worst
it's been in my lifetime.
And so I think to just acknowledge
that the sooner that can end
the damage that has been done now,
you know, for the last four months,
is going to last lifetimes.
It's going to be remembered for lifetimes.
And so the sooner that can stop
and anyone, anywhere
who can do anything to stop it,
is welcome to contribute to stop it.
I mean, the deaths, the killing,
the hostage situation has to stop today.
So I just want to acknowledge
this is happening right now,
and it's dire.
People are on the verge
of starvation in Gaza.
Aid has to get in now.
So just to sort of acknowledge that.
Then just a couple of things more,
You asked about the future, Cloe.
For things to move forward,
both sides -- and some people hate
when you just say the word both sides --
well, both sides in this case, all sides,
have extremists that are going
to make peace very difficult.
And they're not just a couple
of hundred people.
You know, there are hundreds
of thousands of people on each side
who believe that the whole
place belongs to them
and are going to make peace difficult.
And the problem here is that each side
has to sideline their own extremists.
Israel, I don't believe,
this is my personal view here,
Israel is not going to defeat Hamas.
I think Hamas represents an idea.
I don't think Hamas can be defeated.
In the same way, it's not
for the Palestinians to go
and defeat the settlers.
I don't think they can.
I think that the Jews
have to handle their extremists.
The Palestinians have
to handle their extremists.
This is really the work that Ali is doing.
And that is incredibly, to me, heroic,
dealing with your own extremes.
Otherwise nothing changes.
And unless both sides can deal
with their extremes,
nothing is going to change here.
CSB: Thank you both for that.
And Ami, you're sort of
touching on this a bit,
but I think it would be really helpful
to hear from both of you
on what you each view
as distinctly Israeli
and distinctly Palestinian
responsibilities
in this quest for peace.
You've mentioned extremists,
but what else is there in that?
And feel free to continue, Ami.
AD: Well, there are two things here.
Let me actually start
with the more abstract one.
I think sometimes people ask,
you know, each other,
or they can ask me in some cases,
why is this whole conflict so intractable?
And I think there are two answers.
One answer is sort of the obvious one,
which is that you have a piece of land
[that] the two groups want.
And this is not a border dispute,
this is something
relatively rare in the world.
You have a situation where large
portions of two groups believe
that the whole thing is theirs,
and that the other one
should just basically leave
or be second-class citizens.
So it's a fight about the whole thing.
And that part is relatively
easy to explain.
You have a fight over a piece of land.
It doesn't help that on both sides
you have substantial numbers of people
who believe that God
is literally on their side.
That doesn't help.
You know, I tell people sometimes
that Jews and Palestinians
get along in Brooklyn
because no one believes that God
gave Brooklyn to them, right?
And so whereas here,
you literally have a situation
where people believe that God
is on their side, that's not helpful.
The part that's, I think, tougher,
there's this conflict of narratives.
Both sides have a narrative
of why they are the ones
that sort of should own this place,
the narrative that you believe,
the narrative you are drawn to,
the narrative you support,
honestly, very often happens to be
literally the first one you heard,
whether from your parents, your family,
your nation or a friend,
you heard that narrative.
Both narratives sound good
because both narratives are legitimate.
And until enough people
on both sides agree
that the narrative of the other
side has some merit,
we don't get anywhere.
And this is, I think,
what Ali was referring to earlier,
seeing that there are two peoples here.
And yes, you can argue forever
on what happened 100 years ago,
200 years ago, etc.
I don't find those arguments
helpful anymore.
We're here, we're stuck,
we have to move forward.
We can acknowledge what happened.
And then lastly, Cloe, to your question
about responsibilities,
obviously there's an occupation
that Israel has the upper hand.
At the same time, and last thing
I’ll say about perception,
and I hope this can make sense
to some people,
the occupation is perceived
very differently
by many or most Palestinians
and their supporters
and many, many Israelis.
There's an interesting sort of metaphor
that I think works really nicely,
of two people wrestling,
and one of those two people
basically has the advantage,
is physically stronger
and is essentially the one on top, right?
So I'm basically pinning you down.
And that metaphor for the occupation
works in a sense of Israel is the one
that's pinning down the Palestinians.
You know, it's the oppressor
state, if you like.
And if you take that model,
then this ends when the oppressor gets up
and releases the one
that is underneath, right?
That's that sort of basic metaphor.
And that's the Palestinian perception
and supporters of the Palestinians.
If Israel simply stops occupying,
the occupation ends.
The Israeli perception,
not everyone, of course,
is that, yes, one is sort of,
you know, pinning the other down,
but that the one that's lying underneath
has a knife in their hand.
And so if I let you go, you will stab me.
And this is why, this is very specifically
why, October 7 was so destructive.
Because it "proved" to those people
who believe if you just let go,
they will stab you,
that in fact, they will.
And so you get into this whole thing
of how can we allow, you know,
a Palestinian state in the West Bank,
two minutes from the airport, etc.
if they will lob missiles from there?
So there's a mutual responsibility
because unless the perceived threat
of violence and death is removed,
you're not going to sort of let go.
And so it has to come together.
There has to be, on the one hand,
Israel, from my point of view,
and this is where Israelis can get mad,
I think Israel has not made a good-faith
effort to say, let’s end this thing truly.
A good-faith effort would mean
no more settlements, for example,
as we have in the last 50 years.
Let's truly find a way to end this,
a way in which Jerusalem is shared,
in which we truly can live
together in some way,
two states, one, I don't really care.
We'll make a good-faith effort,
truly a good-faith effort.
And then Palestinians can make
their own sort of effort.
So, it's complicated.
It requires both.
One side can't do this.
AAA: Makes a lot of sense.
I mean, what I feel like
adding to what Ami just said,
I think we have to start from the deep,
deep roots of the problem.
First of all, both sides
have to describe the problem right.
Because half way to the solution
is the right description to the problem.
The description of the problem
is all about the other side.
No, the problem is also us.
Each one has to look in the mirror
and see where they fail to achieve
peaceful future for their kids
at least.
And this is very hard, painful lesson
because you cannot ask a victim
to judge himself
because it's much easier
to judge the other,
but not to judge ourselves.
Number two, we need a clear vision.
What is our vision of solution?
And when I say a vision,
I don't mean one state,
two state, three states.
Any politician or any group
of people, leaders,
[who] will put both identities
in a place of harmony
and that can function in a way
that will give everyone
the chance to practice who they are
without building their ideology
or security or freedom
on the other side's expense,
he will be my hero.
One state, two state,
federal solution, 100 state,
this is not the question.
The question will be to the mission,
which is number three.
The mission has to be
creating an environment
where solutions are possible
because today everything is impossible.
The only possible thing is to fight.
But when we look forward
and when we look further,
we don't see ...
We just see graves.
We don't see any kind
of normal environment.
Then the homework to do
is through social change
that has to be created to lead
for political change,
because there are values
that we need to build
in our own societies.
We clean up trash from streets.
Then people say what [does] this
have to do with the occupation?
It's all about to do with the occupation.
Because what's the connection
between the trash on the streets,
if we want statehood,
if we want an independent, democratic,
clean society and the occupation,
we have to be free.
Because no one will free us
as long as we are making an excuse
to destroy ourselves
and give the occupation even legitimacy
to destroy us more and more.
So this is a self lead
and a self responsibility.
On the other hand,
I have been saying,
my biggest enemy are not the Jews,
our biggest enemy
are not the Jewish people.
It’s the fear of the Jews that costs us
a price of our dignity and freedom.
So Jewish people have to heal
also their own fear
and understand that the Holocaust is over.
It’s over, and never again.
And Palestinians have to say
that, never again,
before Jews say that.
Because this crime
should not be allowed anymore
for any human being on Earth,
not just for Jews, for everyone,
for the people in Gaza, for the people
in Sderot, for everyone.
If we are really solution-makers.
Finally, this environment will be led
and labeled by nonviolence
because nonviolence can promote
every solution for every need
in the society.
We cannot start with reconciliation.
Listen, we don't love each other.
We kill each other.
We cannot just hug each other for hummus
and say, let's pray for peace.
No, this is not going to work.
We need nonviolence activism
because Israelis and Palestinians need
to achieve security and freedom.
Then we need a political agreement.
We need a reconciliation process
between both sides.
So this is how I see it in three steps.
CSB: Thank you both
for your beautiful words on this.
It's really powerful to hear both of you
share how this could look.
And it's very inspiring.
And one question actually
from several people
that has come up in different variations
that I think is a nice segue,
is, what other countries can do
to help this situation?
So let's start with you again, Ami,
and go back to Ali after that.
AD: So two things.
One is I would say --
well, maybe three things.
One is do no harm.
There's a lot of harm
coming in from people
basically from the outside, from far away,
less governments or in some cases
governments as well,
who basically express the wish of one
or two of these communities to disappear.
Basically, just say it straight.
That needs to stop.
So one is do no harm.
Second, even this is probably
the worst moment
that we've had since 1948,
there are groups of people on the ground
who are working together.
One, for example,
relatively well-known right now
is a group called Standing Together,
you can check them out.
People on the ground,
Jews and Palestinians,
doing what they can to find a way forward.
Anything that helps them is good.
Anything that gets in their way is bad.
So that's like one way of saying this.
Anything that helps Ali
in what he's trying to do is good.
Anything that hinders him is bad.
And then lastly the question really
was about foreign governments.
I think that some pressure is useful.
Incentives, I think, are better.
Carrots are better than sticks.
These are two pretty stubborn peoples.
And pressuring them, I think,
is like a pressure cooker
is not going to help.
So many Israelis and Jews are convinced
that the world hates us anyway.
So if you do something like, you know,
kick Israel out of the Olympics,
in Israel, that'll be taken as,
"Well, of course they did,
they all hate us anyway," right?
So that is not going
to actually move the needle.
Incentives, by the way, would.
And I’ll give you sort of
a crazy-sounding one maybe,
but sometimes things have to be crazy.
Both countries are pretty small.
I mean, both populations are pretty small.
We're talking 14 million people.
If the European Union, that in many ways,
Europe "owes" us both
for all kinds of historical stuff.
If the EU told the Palestinians
and the Israelis,
"If you guys make peace,
you can join the EU."
Like, how awesome would that be?
But go make peace and get back to us,
and you can actually
join the EU as full members.
It'd be great to have Lebanon as well.
That's a personal preference,
that would actually rock.
But anyway, the Levant can join Europe.
So I think incentives of all kinds
would be more helpful.
Security guarantees are also,
you know, useful.
Just applying pressure,
I don't think is going to work.
AAA: Yeah, I have been, I mean,
for the last 20 years
of my activism of nonviolence,
I have been calling on everyone.
If you are pro-those or pro-those,
this is not going to help.
We need you to be pro-solution.
Yes, definitely we are not equal.
We're not equal on the ground,
we are not equal by life condition.
But we are both capable
to run ourselves by ourselves
and to create the best
cooperation in the Middle East
between Israel and Palestine.
And we need you as a third party
to be part of the solution,
not part of the problem.
Because if you cannot be
part of the solution,
don't be part of the problem.
And if you are not part
of the problem already,
try to be part of the solution
how to engage in this conflict,
and it's not easy.
I'm telling you, watching the images
that come out of Gaza is not easy.
Watching the hostage people
there is not easy.
I mean, it's so hard to be
nonviolence activist these days,
and the challenges are so huge.
And that's why we need
a collective movement
that can speak to the reality
and to the need.
And by the way, people
are calling for cease fire.
I'm not calling just for cease fire.
I'm calling for cease conflict.
Because if we agree
about ceasing the conflict,
we will not need a cease fire.
This is going to be a part
of an international agreement
with international guarantees,
with international pressure,
that both sides also need
to trust the process itself
by engaging the third party.
And last thing I will say,
if you are pro-Israel,
don't jump on any Muslim
and hurt or smash his face.
If you are pro-Palestine, please don't
create conflict in your own community
because we have one conflict to deal with.
We're not ready
also to deal with conflicts
that have been created
in your own communities
because you are pro one of us.
CSB: Thank you.
And we're getting some
insightful questions right now
that are about sort of
the bigger picture here.
As one of you said, this conflict
doesn't exist in a bubble, right?
So Karen asks, since the conflict
is not limited to Israel-Palestine,
but is just a fragment
of a conflict between Israel
and Arab countries all across the region,
what can you say about a peaceful
future in that context?
And let's start with you, Ali.
AAA: That's a great question.
I mean, watching the normalization process
with Israel in the last few years,
within the occupation,
within the injustices
is just a big answer to this question.
I think the Arabs are ready
to normalize with Israel
and even the top Arab
country, Saudi Arabia,
has mentioned this already.
But these normalization processes
are happening between governments.
This is not a real normalization.
We need normalization between people.
And normalization between people
will never be achieved
by ignoring the Palestinian issue aside.
The Palestinian people
will be the best gate for Israel
to enter the Islamic and Arab world.
Without that key, Israel
will never be able to normalize.
On the other hand,
all of these normalization efforts
are good if they become effective
to transform Israel
and Israeli mind toward the Palestinians.
I'm not against it,
but I don't think
this is the right approach
without the Palestinians.
The world has changed.
And don’t think that the Arabs
just hug us and they love us.
Believe me, sometimes Palestinians
get humiliated in Arab countries
more than Israelis.
Many Israeli friends
recently has traveled.
I mean, before the war, not after.
Have traveled to Emirates,
to other places.
And they try to speak
about the Palestinians,
Israelis, can you imagine?
Then the Arab response was,
we don't want to speak about this.
Can you imagine,
Israelis are raising our issue
and the Arabs are putting it down.
AD: I agree with every word
that Ali just said.
And I think that part of the -- you know,
as a kid, you know, growing up in Israel,
the big threat was Egypt and Syria
and Jordan and these other countries.
And I think that that fundamental
feeling of threat is still there.
Even though Sadat came,
you know, 45 years ago
and we've had, yes, not the warmest peace,
but we've had a very functional peace
with Egypt and Jordan.
And, you know,
Lebanon could easily happen.
Saudi Arabia has very seriously
been looking for this and wants this.
And so again, you know, Israelis
can get mad at me for saying this,
Israel has to decide what it wants.
Certain people within Israeli society
have to decide what is more important,
keeping the West Bank, you know, forever
keeping the Palestinians
as oppressed citizens,
without rights in the West Bank
and also in Gaza.
Or, integrating in the region.
I think the region
is absolutely ready to --
that's my sense --
most of the region is ready to,
for lack of a better word, do business.
I mean, you see it now in Dubai.
You see it in other places.
So I think this can absolutely happen.
But there has to be a decision
of what really matters,
sort of, in the end.
The Palestinian conflict,
the Palestinian issue, is a hard one.
If that gets settled, everything
else falls into place, I believe.
AAA: The closest people
to Israelis are not the Saudis.
They are the Palestinians.
And if you try it,
you will figure it out on the ground.
We are the closest Arab to Israel,
even though the occupation,
even though the hate,
even though the violence,
people are existing
from each other already.
AD: I think one thing on that, Chloe,
is that when, you know,
if someone wants a moment of optimism,
in the middle of this whole horror,
the best thing that anyone can do
is to visit a hospital in Israel.
If you visit a hospital in Israel,
what you will see is that even though
about 22 percent of Israeli
citizens are Arabs, Palestinians,
more than 25 percent of physicians
in Israel are Palestinian,
40 percent of pharmacists,
more than 30 percent of nurses.
So if you go to any hospital,
you'll see that the teams are basically
completely integrated,
the patients are sitting,
are lying side by side.
Muslims are operating on Jews
and vice versa.
And it works.
And it works more than many
other national rivalries
I can imagine.
There was someone in Jerusalem
a few years ago
who had this idea of, you know,
a "for peace" idea where all he did
was on Friday evenings,
he invited people across the city
to play backgammon.
That was it.
Come play backgammon.
That's the agenda, basically.
And you had hundreds of people,
religious, secular, Arabs, Jews,
coming and playing backgammon
and laughing and eating.
And you could see how, yes,
of course, there's a conflict,
But actually, culturally and personally,
people get along and can get along.
Now all this to say, and I just,
I think Ali and I are bringing
sort of positive outlook to this.
The moment is horrible.
The moment is the worst in my life by far.
I mean, I'll tell you one
really quick sort of thing
to give some perspective to this.
I woke up on the morning
of October 7, that Saturday.
I think, you know,
people learned about this,
depending on when they went to bed.
So I learned that this was happening
at eight in the morning,
that Saturday morning,
I woke up, I was in New York,
and I opened and someone said,
"Oh, there's something
happening in Israel."
I'll never forget in my life.
The New York Times headline said,
“Terrorist incursion from Gaza, 22 dead.”
In that moment, it was 22 dead.
That's all that was reported.
And my wife came down the stairs,
and she saw that my face had changed.
She said, what's going on?
And based on those 22 deaths, I said,
"Everything is over."
Everything is over, basically.
Peace in my lifetime, Gaza.
And then of course, it went up to,
you know, hundreds and over 1,000.
But it's hard to explain to people
the depth of what happened that day,
the depth of the shock.
If two Hamas people, if two terrorists,
two, had crossed the border
and had killed one family
and kidnapped two people,
that would have been
a national scandal in Israel.
What happened was completely unimaginable.
And this is why, four months later,
most Israelis are still there.
Also, this is what they're seeing
on television every day.
Every day in Israel now on TV
is a repeat of October 7.
Very few images of Gaza.
Israel is probably,
I know this is going to sound weird,
and maybe literally incredible
to some people,
Israel is probably the least
informed country in the world
about what's happening in Gaza.
The media does not show the images.
You have to go look for them.
And obviously you don’t
necessarily want to,
or you justify them in all
kinds of different ways.
And so I don't want to minimize
because of, you know,
Ali's and mine sort of positivity here,
that this moment is horrific,
and it's going to take tremendous work
to come out of this
and that the priority
is to just stop the deaths now,
if we possibly can,
whoever has influence on that,
this has to stop as soon as possible.
CSB: It's a really powerful reminder
of how every part of the world
will see this so differently,
based on the stories that they are told
and how the media portrays it,
and also how we feel based on history.
And it actually makes me think
of something you said earlier, Ami,
which was, you said that people
associate the conflict
with the first story that they were told,
you know, however they
understood Israel Palestine is
as children when they learned about it,
is how they will interpret
the conflict today.
So I'd actually love to hear,
if you're both willing to share,
what the story you think should be told
to the next generation,
because everyone puts so much hope
in the future and in the young,
the youngest generation,
sometimes too much,
too much pressure on young people
to solve the world's problems.
But if we can start there with the story
that we tell to our children,
What could that be?
Let's start with you again, Ami,
and then go to you, Ali.
AD: We're in this together.
We're basically Siamese twins
that have sort of been,
you know, condemned to live together.
And at some point you either see the other
as equally human or you don't.
You're not brought up to.
This is not how you're brought up,
to see the other.
But if at some point
you cross that threshold,
there's no going back.
And so to me, you know,
what I would tell my daughters
is we're all human here,
we're all in this together.
No one is leaving.
The past matters a lot,
but the future matters more.
And so what can we do now
about the future?
The past, you know, the past can be
as important as you want.
I don't care how important
you want to make it.
The future matters more.
To me, always.
And it's about also human friendships.
I think one of the sad things
is that, you know,
not enough people on either side
have true friendships on the other,
true people that you would,
you know, lie down for.
And I think that's important as well.
So making and then keeping
those friendships
becomes, I think, really critical.
CSB: Thank you. And how about you, Ali?
What do you believe the story
should be told to our children?
AAA: The main elements
for the story is to tell the truth.
But not just our truth.
It's also the other side's truth.
Because what makes our truth truthful
is not that we believe in it.
It makes it true and truthful
when others start believing in it.
But others will not start believing
in it if we practice it one-sided.
If we don't include the other.
And this is a big problem for both sides.
They practice, they go to history
as one nation, one people, one land,
one God, and that's it.
Well, I believe one God,
but I think the same God
has created both of us.
And this is the first truth.
It's not anyone who brought,
I mean, Israel here.
Even Judaism didn't come
through people here.
It came by God.
And this is what’s in my Koran as Muslim,
this is one fact.
So this is something
that has to be taught.
But we don't teach that.
On the other hand,
we don't teach about the Holocaust.
Many people will ignore
or limit the Holocaust.
We just label the other
by blinding ourselves to their truth.
And this doesn't work.
Listen, I didn't grow up
with the best education for peace.
But I didn't grow up with hate.
I mean, I was born as a refugee.
My father's story was to lose
his home because of 1948,
when Israel was established.
Then I was born to a political mother,
who served years in prison.
Then I throw stones on Israeli soldiers,
where I served years in prison.
Me and her had to have hunger strike
for 17 days to see each other.
And after I was released by Oslo Peace
initiative between both sides,
I was wounded by settlers,
and my brother was killed.
What more do I have to prove
that even though all of these prices,
I'm still willing to see Ami
as my best partner,
my best human being and my best friend?
What do I have to do more to prove
to the world that I am capable
and I deserve dignity
because Ami's security is my top priority?
What do I have to do more?
But with these dictators
who are managing both of us,
nothing, no voice is heard
because they know how to destroy.
Both sides, their leadership.
Number two, I am teaching
my kids my story.
But I'm not teaching them just my story.
I'm teaching them the story
of an Israeli mother
who had lost her daughter
by a suicide bomber,
and she’s still willing to stand
for our mothers and women.
These stories have to be taught,
and the world has to repeat them.
And I'm so thankful to you
to give us, me and Ami,
this platform to tell the world
that whatever the world will do,
we will never give up each other
because we cannot.
You know, I speak to Israeli soldiers
sometimes before they go to the army.
I tell them, listen, you are
not going to secure Israel.
Your top priority
is to secure the Palestinians.
You cannot refuse the army, fine.
But don't be humiliating Palestinians
because of that security issue.
Because it's like drugs.
And when I tell Palestinians,
I'm not asking you to love
the Jewish people,
I'm not asking you to jump tomorrow
and hug the soldiers.
But I'm asking you to love yourself first,
because when we start loving ourselves,
we will be able to see
the beauty of the other side.
It's like exactly nonviolence.
Nonviolence is, you know,
it's not my humanity that is my weapon
in nonviolence approach.
It's Ami's humanity
that's become my weapon.
It's my enemy's humanity,
who's supposed to be my enemy.
These are lessons and practice
that we teach our kids,
and we have to teach our kids every day.
CSB: Thank you, Ali, for also sharing
part of your powerful story
and what brought you to this work.
And thank you, Ami,
for your answer as well.
I think we have time
for one more question,
and several TED members
have asked a version of this,
which is that both of you hold
these beliefs about Israel and Palestine,
that other respective Israelis
and Palestinians
have critiqued each of you for,
saying you're not advocating
for your own community's interests enough.
And so how do you respond to that?
How do you make the case
that what you believe is worth spreading?
And let's go back to you, Ali, again.
AAA: I think my first
community priority is peace.
But sometimes, what peace
are we talking about?
Is it to be good kids
and accept the status quo?
This is not the peace
that I'm advocating for.
You know, sometimes people ask me,
"What do you do in life?"
I tell them I collect garbage of others,
but I make sure that I recycle
that every day.
Because otherwise it's easy to get broken.
So we're dealing with trauma.
We are dealing with injustices every day.
We are dealing with threats
and violence every day.
It’s not easy to be a solution-maker.
And by the way, I'm not optimistic.
What motivates me is not my optimism.
What motivates me is my belief.
There is big difference
between those who have hope
or those who are believers.
Give me one believer who managed
to create change on this planet
without paying the highest
prices for that.
From the prophets to politicians
to nonviolence leaders,
even to militant leaders.
There is always a price.
But nonviolence for me is not,
has not come by a promise from anyone
that Israel is going to give me
my freedom tomorrow.
My belief of nonviolence
because the one who killed my brother
and the one who humiliated my mother
wanted to bury my humanity
in the same grave of my brother.
I refuse for my humanity to be buried.
Why?
Because I will never accept a freedom
that will be built on other Jewish graves.
This is not the freedom that I want.
I want a freedom
that will be built with other lives.
And for me, nonviolence,
don't think that I live in a paradise, OK?
My life is full of poison every day.
Meeting those who are
like, full of hate, of anger.
But I can see the beauty
of their humanity,
and I can still take that to activism.
And I transform thousands of people.
Nonviolence gives me
a taste of my life every day.
Nonviolence gives me a reason
to wake up in the morning
and be able to transform
an officer in a checkpoint.
And there are many stories.
Hopefully my manifesto
will be public soon.
We don't need everyone to be in agreement
because when you build a bridge,
you don't need millions.
You need a group of professionals
with a good plan and good resources
where millions can pass through afterward.
Nations are, in general,
followers of good leadership.
We need leadership.
And we need those millions on the ground
as I said,
their interest is to have peace
yesterday, not tomorrow.
AD: Ali, thank you, you got me
to tear up earlier,
which, thank you for that.
Everything you said.
What Ali is doing right now
in the West Bank in Palestine
is really hard.
It is one thing that I want also
people to take away from this chat
is that he's doing it.
There's another pervasive myth
out there in the world
that someone like Ali could not be saying
what he's saying and be safe.
That Hamas would have killed him
years ago for saying what he's saying.
Well, there he is.
He's going to go have dinner after this,
and he's perfectly safe.
And so I think
this is absolutely possible.
I also want to say, Ali, that,
you know, you mentioned your prison,
your mother, your brother,
and I know that I did not
do this personally,
but I just want to say that I'm sorry.
I think that that doesn't happen enough.
I'm extremely sorry for everything
you have had to go through
just for the accident of being born there.
None of us chose where we were born.
And so I think that ...
And the last thing
I think is that -- sorry ...
There's a human piece here.
There are people in Israel
whose dream is to kick Ali
out of his house
and of where he is.
And all I can say is,
you'd have to go through me first,
because the human piece here
is more important
than any kind of national slogan.
And so, yeah,
you don't remove Ali from this place
without having to go through some of us
to do that.
So thank you all for having us.
I know we're pretty close
to the ending here.
Thanks for those who stuck with us.
And, Ali, more more power to you.
AAA: Thank you, Ami, thank you.
Thank you.
CSB: Thank you both so much
for this incredibly moving, powerful,
and productive discussion.
Thank you again, Ali, Ami,
have a wonderful day.
And we wish you well.
AAA: Thank you for having us.
[Want to join conversations
like this live?]
[Become a TED Member!]
[Sign up at ted.com/membership]